April 3rd, 2011
|
Author: “Prosser deserves a chance to defend his record as a justice in the general election. Among the challengers, Kloppenburg has by far the strongest qualifications.
“We endorse David Prosser and JoAnne Kloppenburg.”
“…we do have evidence that Prosser is an intemperate figure given to partisan rhetoric. This is troubling in a justice.
“There is no way to avoid it: We are deeply troubled by the incident, made public during this campaign, in which Prosser blew up at Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson, calling her a “bitch” and threatening to “destroy her.”
“What that indicates is an injudicious personality, plain and simple. It’s unacceptable behavior in any circumstance — and surely it’s worst of all in a Supreme Court Justice, whose entire job is to make rational decisions without prejudice.
What’s worse, Prosser’s public statements indicate no ability whatsoever to take responsibility for his own actions. It’s a very revealing episode, and frankly there is no defending it…
Lastly, we are troubled by Prosser’s decision last year to vote in favor of an ethics rule, written by the Wisconsin Realtors Association, which stated that justices need not recuse themselves from cases involving campaign donors, no matter how large the contribution. For the judiciary to have credibility with the public, there must be some sort of recusal standard in place — sometimes the appearance of a conflict of interest can be as damaging to the court as an actual conflict.
“We endorse Kloppenburg because she can act as an impartial, nonpartisan justice.”
I’ll note that the Prosser website still links only to a Journal Sentinel primary endorsement editorial, overlooking the paper’s general election endorsement editorial that ran April 3rd.
And also posts an editorial from the Sun Prairie Star dated March 24th – - the same day as the Wausau Daily Herald posted its Kloppenburg endorsement.
Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.
Posted in Uncategorized